Ok. Have we all heard enough about the dueling security speeches yet? I have been so frustrated with the coverage. I didn’t have a chance to see the speeches live, but heard clips of Cheney and read the text of Obama. I just don’t get the coverage of the speeches. They act like these guys are even on the same playing field. Please.
Dick. It’s over. You guys lost. Defining your policies as successful successful because we have not had another terrorist attack in this country… well, that’s just not the full picture now is it? The world at large learned to hate us over the last seven years of the Bush administration making terrorism more of a threat than ever before. All the scowling and menacing talk peppered with 9-11 is just the same tired arguments you have been pedaling since 9-11.
The coverage didn’t seem to reflect what I saw. What we heard from the news is that each man gave a speech. The discussion of the content was minimal. Come on people. We have one guy arguing for continuing to torture people and another guy saying we should live by the law. Geez. I wonder who really has a case and who is just a mental case. Most disappointing was the three minutes I heard on NPR where they spent considerable time discussing the headline in the paper “Thrilla Near the Hilla” with the comparison to the Thrilla in Manila. Please. There was even discussion about them continuing this debate and selling tickets as if it was some real contest. It was about as much of a contest as if BHO and Dick in his wheelchair hit the court for a little one on one. Also disappointing was the Daily Show taking the easy way out for the coverage – splicing BHO and Bush using similar phrasing, but liked the visual of what I’m trying to say here when they showed BHO on the beach and Cheney in his chair.
And for the comic geeks out there – I think we got us a comic guy as Prez. He said, “Because in our system of checks and balances, someone must always watch over the watchers…” Alright. That sounds like a Watchmen reference to me
Who are we
Tags: 24, media, torture, water boarding
Some times to really see yourself, you have to see yourself through someone else’s eyes. So, while watching this video, I kept wondering exactly who we are.
And I kept thinking that we are fools. This is a big country and there is a range of opinions that cover the entire spectrum on all issues including this one. Still, at our core, don’t most of us know what is really being said regardless of the language being used? We know that “harsh” or “brutal interrogation techniques” is torture, don’t we? Or were we not listening when they described water boarding? Did we not see the simulations and drawings of what it would be like? Come on, didn’t you wonder what it would be like to go through that when you heard? If so, surely you also thought it would be torture. Regardless of what we call it, is that really who we are as a people?
Or maybe we just didn’t hear the reports. Maybe we were too busy watching 24 where it is ok to torture and it actually produces results. Maybe we are already living in Idiocracy where we think that TV is reality. We already believe that reality TV is reality when it is anything but, so is it that hard to make the jump to over dramatic TV dramas being real too? Then there is Cheney. I think he really believes what he says.
Then there is the media who gives credence to anyone willing to say anything that might cause a buzz but too afraid to call the obvious the truth. It is the most blessed thing that everyone has a right to state their opinion. We should not forget, however, that it is also our right – and the media’s duty – to call out those that have no credence and to simply state that there is no proof or fact to support their claim. If all voices are given equal credence under all circumstances, there is no relevance to the debate.
There are a gazillion voices on line blogging and tweeting and opinionating on everything under the sun. It is just so unfortunate that those with the biggest platform often have the least to say and yell it loudly to the lowest common denominator.